Archive

Posts Tagged ‘ugly’

Why do you think of yourself as “ugly”?

December 6th, 2009 Ugly Womans Guide 1 comment

Hordes of people have asked me, “Why do you think of yourself as ugly?”

The fact is, I don’t.

However, during my years in the world of internet dating, at least 30 men (out of 70) rejected me because (they said) they didn’t feel “chemistry” or I didn’t have “The Look.” This is really an indelicate way of saying, “You’re not pretty enough for me.”

I chose the title (Ugly Woman’s Guide to Internet Dating) because I have met *SO* many women who gave up on internet dating because of men’s ugly comments to them. The hits on their self-esteem were persistent and unrelenting. Ultimately, these women just threw in the towel and gave up their dream of life-long pair-bonding and decided to get another cat. I understand their pain.

My book is not about ugly women. It’s about the fact that in this internet dating culture, women are judged first and foremost by their thumbnail profile picture, often to the exclusion of all else. And what can you really learn about someone’s character, spirituality, maturity or goodness by looking at ¾” picture?

Nothing.

Like most women, I’m “average” looking (hence, the term). And in the process of these 70 first dates, I became disgusted with the fact that these men were only interested in women who had “the look.”

So I did a little experiment.

Continued at, “Why do you think of yourself as “ugly”? (Part II)

Buy the book here.

“Ugly” is such a harsh word

December 1st, 2009 Ugly Womans Guide 1 comment

And so many people have asked me, “Why do you think of yourself as ugly?”

The short answer is, I don’t.

However,  during my years in the world of internet dating, at least two dozen men rejected me because (they said)  they didn’t feel “chemistry” or I didn’t have “The Look.” As most experienced female daters know, this is a frightfully indelicate way of saying, “You’re not pretty enough for my tastes.”

I chose the title of my book with much forethought and care. And I chose the word “ugly” because I know so many women who gave up on internet dating after experiencing the persistent and ruthless assault on their self-esteem. The book, in fact, is not about ugly women, per se.

It’s about the fact that in this internet dating culture, women are judged first and foremost by their thumbnail profile picture, often to the exclusion of all else. That’s what it’s really about.

And what can you really learn about someone’s character, integrity, maturity or goodness by looking at ¾” picture?

Nothing.

Back in the day, we met through church gatherings, the workplace, social organizations or common friends. And in those settings, you could really learn about a person; their likes and dislikes, their integrity and behavior and intellect and capabilities.  And that’s a far better way to get to know someone.

For years and years, we taught our children that one should never judge a book by its cover, yet now we’ve created a system of pair-bonding that does just that. During the time that I was dating, I felt like I was being browsed. I wanted to find a man that’d decide I was worth more than a cursory glance at my “cover.” I wanted to be studied.

And ultimately, I found that man. As I look at this experience in the rear-view mirror, I feel sympathy for my women  friends who did not have the courage or resolve to endure as much rejection as I endured. Finding a suitable mate shouldn’t be so rife with heart-ache, disappointment and rejection. Unfortunately, for the less-than-beautiful woman, internet dating is no fun whatsoever.

And all because - it would appear - that society has taught men that women should be judged by their cover.

Honey, would you stir the raw sewage before we eat?

November 30th, 2009 Ugly Womans Guide 1 comment

There’s a wonderful book titled, “The Good Old Days, They Were Awful!” It’s an interesting book with many stories of how life “back in the day” was not all peaches and cream. I agree with that - to an extent - but there were some bonuses to life back then. However, as far as issues of sanitation, we’re miles ahead of our ancestors who lived in the early 1900s.

Here’s an ad from the American Carpenter and Builder Magazine, from 1912. (Story continues below photos.)

1912 American Carpenter and Builder ad

1912 American Carpenter and Builder ad

Close up of the modern toilet

Close up of the modern toilet

Take a better look at this contraption. In short, the (ahem) “human waste products” were dropped into a steel box directly under your house (aka basement or foundation). After a time, you’d stir the (ahem) contents in this box and add chemicals a couple times a week.  See the handle beside the toilet (on the floor)?  That’s your stirrer. And see the large pipe behind the toilet? In a perfect world, that’s a vent pipe that directs odors out of the living space. In a perfect world.

I suppose for those who were accustomed to donning warm shoes and making the long trek to the outhouse in the backyard, this “chemical toilet” was better. I suppose.  But in the real world, that thing must have stunk to high heaven. And what poor soul was charged with crawling under the house and cleaning out the box twice a year?

I love studying the good old days and I love writing about the good old days. However, when I finally learn how to travel back in time, I think I’ll take my modern plumbing with me.

One of my favorite photos of a Sears House

November 20th, 2009 Ugly Womans Guide 1 comment

I purchased this picture on eBay for $3.00 many years ago. What a thrill to find an original picture of a Sears Home from the 1910s!

This house came out of the Sears Roebuck catalog and was shipped in 30,000 pieces.

The house was shipped by railroad and after the boxcar arrived it was moved over to a siding. You then had 24 hours to unload all those pieces of house!  Typically, it took many trips to and from the train station to get the boxcar unloaded and that’s why Sears Homes are often found within 1-2 miles of railroad tracks.  Each piece of lumber was stamped with a letter and numbers to facilitate assembly (see image at bottom of screen).

A 75-page leather-bound instruction book, with the homeowner’s name embossed in gold on the cover, gave precise directions on the proper placement of those 30,000 pieces of house. The book offered this somber (and probably wise) warning:  “Do not take anyone’s advice as to how this building should be assembled.”

In 1908, Sears estimated that a carpenter would charge $450.00 to erect your spacious two-story foursquare, with its hipped roof and a lone shed dormer in the attic. However, Sears also promised that a man with an elementary understanding of construction techniques would be able to assemble the house.

According to their calculations, a painter would want $34.50 to paint the two-story house.  The plasterer’s bill would be around $200, they figured, which included nailing up 840 square yards of wooden lath and applying three coats of plaster.

Masonry (block, brick, cement) and plaster were not included in the kit, but the Bill of Materials List advised that 1300 cement blocks would be needed for the basement walls and foundation.

The salutary effects of living in a modern home were extolled throughout the pages of the Sears catalogs. Beyond the financial freedom and comfort in old age that owning a Sears home would surely bring, Sears promised that their modern homes would improve the health, morals and well-being of its occupants.

The term “Modern Home” was part of the vernacular in the early 1900s. It was a descriptive term indicating that a house had modern amenities (that we take for granted today), such as a primitive, centralized heating system, electricity and indoor plumbing. In some cases, the houses were more modern than the communities in which they were built.

An original photo of a Sears House from about 1912 or so

An original photo of a Sears House from about 1912 or so

Heres the catalog page from a 1913 Sears Modern Homes catalog

Here's the catalog page from a 1913 Sears Modern Homes catalog

Picture of marked lumber from a Sears House. The mark is usually found about 2-8 from the end of the beam

Picture of marked lumber from a Sears House. The mark is usually found about 2-8" from the end of the beam and is often in black ink. The "D" represented that this was a 2x8, C for a 2x6 and B for a 2x4. This mark, together with that 75-page instruction book facilitated construction.

To buy an autographed copy of  The Houses That Sears Built, click here. It makes the perfect Christmas present!


Did I mention that it makes the perfect Christmas present?

An Ugly Title

November 1st, 2009 Ugly Womans Guide 1 comment

“But you’re not an ugly woman,” was the response I received from a few male friends when I told them the title of this book. Their words were very carefully chosen as they voiced their protest.

One man responded by telling me (rather haltingly, as he scrambled desperately to find the right words), “Rose, you have (pause) many (longer pause) attractive features” (deep cleansing breath).

The image of a Mrs. Potato Head toy popped into my mind. She has “many attractive features,” such as those full lips that curl up on the edges, her beautiful blue eyes with their luxuriant lashes (presumably for flirting with her special spud spouse). And all of  her detachable noses are just precious. That cute little tuft of hair is the finishing touch. However, I would never describe the missus as a pretty potato. Even with those “many attractive features,” she was still a homely tuber.

Was I a human version of that vintage veggie? The gentleman talking to me had obviously parked himself in an uncomfortable corner, but I knew that he meant well, so I graciously thanked him and left it at that.

The idea for this book - and the title - came to me in a flash of inspiration in early 2004. As the project evolved and the manuscript started to take shape, I began to have some doubts about the wisdom of using the word “ugly” in a title. From a marketing standpoint, a title can make or break a book. The sales of my other books (on historic architecture) have always spiked a month or two before the Christmas holidays.

It wasn’t likely that many people would be purchasing The Ugly Woman’s Guide to Internet Dating at Christmas for their female relatives. And if they did, they’d be looking for other books soon afterwards, like How to Repair Hopelessly Damaged Family Relationships and The Moron’s Guide to Better Gift Buying.

Wasn’t the word ugly being bandied about too much as it was? Weren’t there already enough women in the world who, for whatever regrettable reasons, were struggling under the oppressive mantle of “ugly”? 

As I agonized over this, the local library called and told me that the many books I’d requested on internet dating were now in. The books were an easy read and I finished them in a few days. I was disappointed. These books were not at all what I’d expected and the authors’ experiences bore little resemblance to my own. And while they contained some helpful information, they were devoted primarily to the mechanics of online dating. This is how you write a profile. This is how you respond to a profile. This is what  you do on a first date. Here is a list of the most popular dating websites.

No one was talking about dealing with 12 rejections in a row, or what to do when your email inbox remains empty day after day, or how to respond to a 50-something man when he explains he was hoping to find a woman who was a little more svelte and a little less old.

I checked out the authors’ biographies and photos. The pictures of the handsome, youthful, photogenic authors on the back covers explained a lot. These “how-to-date” books were written by and for the beautiful people.

The books all emphasized the importance of including a photo with your profile, claiming that profiles with photos generated eight to 20 times more response than photo-less profiles. This was the opposite of my experience. Consistently, my photo-free profiles (uploaded at a variety of different sites) generated more (and better) response.

The other salient point, the authors explained, was patience, because women at dating sites were deluged with email from potential suitors. Different things have different meanings to different people, but I wouldn’t consider five emails a month (my personal average) a “deluge.”

There were many such areas where my experience did not match the authors’ descriptions. And it was these differences that convinced me to proceed with this project.

The one-size-fits-all advice contained in the “Beautiful Woman’s Guide to Internet Dating” books is not going to work for all women because internet dating is so utterly beauty-centric. If you’re “average-looking” or “less than beautiful,” you’ll need to make some adjustments and tweak your battle plan.

My friend Liz advised, “Don’t write a book that says, ‘Men are idiots and dating sucks, so save yourself a lot of trouble and buy a puppy instead.’”

Conversely, I didn’t want to promote this flawed message either: “Men are wonderful and a woman’s life isn’t whole and complete unless she’s in a relationship.”

That’s not the thesis of this book. In fact, I’d dare to say that this book doesn’t have a thesis. This is simply my story, and it’s the true story of my experience in the dating world. I wanted to be married. I wanted to know how it felt to be someone’s beloved wife and I wanted it so badly, that I went on 70 first dates and kissed an awful lot of toads, hoping against hope that I’d find a good man with whom to spend the rest of my life.

My dogged persistence was fueled by a simple motive: I longed to be mired in romantic love. I wanted to know how it felt to be cherished and respected and adored and admired by a man. I wanted to have a man that I could cherish and respect and adore and admire. I wanted a man who’d call me pet names like “Peachblossom” and occasionally bring me breakfast in bed. I wanted to have someone to call with my happy news, and someone who’d let me cry on his shoulder when there was bad news.

During this four-year period, I became disgusted with the overly simplistic, one-size-fits-all advice I found in the mainstream books on internet dating. When you’re a “woman of a certain age” and a “woman of a certain size” and a “woman with a certain look,” much of the advice offered in these books is simply bad advice and it’s bad advice that may well leave you with a heart that’s been broken in too many pieces to count. If your heart does survive the experience intact, chances are your self-esteem won’t be so lucky. Dating via a medium that judges you by nothing more than your profile picture is hard for everyone and it is emotional torture for women who feel that they’re less than beautiful.

If it weren’t for the professional success I was enjoying with my newly published book on Sears Homes, I’m sure that my self-esteem would never have survived the experience of being rejected by so many men, who ditched me simply because - in their own words - I didn’t have The Look. In other words, I wasn’t pretty enough for them. And in talking with my less-than-beautiful women friends, I learned that these rejections were not unusual, but in fact, the norm.

As I talk about in Chapter Five, some men are just pigs.

Take Jack for example. Even this charming, decent man had his swinish tendencies. He confessed to me that he’d become so desperate and lonely one Saturday night that he’d gone looking online for a “quickie.” By 9:00 pm, he’d found his desperate fishie and started talking with her via IM. Around midnight, she invited him to her apartment in a nearby city. When she answered the door, he saw a 30-something woman who was morbidly obese, sloppily dressed and profoundly depressed. He was too “grossed out” to have sex with such an enormous woman. She sensed his disappointment as soon as he strolled through her front door. With her three little kids soundly asleep in another room, she offered him oral sex and he accepted. Afterwards, she begged him to stay the night and cuddle with her in the bed. He declined.

“When I got up to leave,” he told me, “she put her head in her hands and wept. She said was ashamed and humiliated by what this damnable loneliness had driven her to do. I didn’t know what to say. I’d used her for free sex and we both knew I’d never be back.”

As much as I hated being the non-stop rejections and foolish men and assaults on my self-esteem, there was something I hated even more: The idea of being alone for the rest of my life.